Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean ...

The U.S. Supreme Court signaled on Monday that it may side—at least in part—with internet service providers in a major copyright dispute that could influence how millions of Americans stay connected.

The Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in a case about pregnancy centers in New Jersey challenging a state investigation ...

The justices seem skeptical of the notion that the subpoena is simply a ‘request’ that will not have a chilling effect on donors.

An attorney representing New Jersey before the U S Supreme Court has admitted that a pro-life pregnancy care center the state subpoenaed had no complaints leveled against it ...

Major record labels brought action against Cox Communications in 2018, arguing the company should be held responsible for customers that committed copyright infringement.

Florida House Democratic Leader Fentrice Driskell slammed a redistricting proposal Monday, saying the only reason it is ...

At issue is whether internet providers can be held liable for repeated copyright infringements of users, with potentially ...

The Supreme Court will hear arguments Monday in a major copyright dispute that internet service providers warn could force millions of Americans offline and turn companies that provide connectivity ...

The Supreme Court debated how to stop music from being illegally copied and shared without jeopardizing internet access for ...

Supreme Court justices expressed numerous concerns today in a case that could determine whether Internet service providers must terminate the accounts of broadband users accused of copyright ...