TikTok ban went before the Supreme Court — here's what happened
TikTok's lawyer danced around the question but said there is no precedent for a foreign government being subject to U.S. free speech laws. He then used a series of analogies, and it didn't seem like the Supreme Court judges were impressed by his answer.
8dOpinion
The Supreme Court seems skeptical of the Chinese-owned platform’s First Amendment claim.
Noel Francisco, representing TikTok and ByteDance, argued that Supreme Court endorsement of this law could enable statutes targeting other companies on similar grounds. "AMC movie theaters ...
8don MSN
After nearly three hours of Supreme Court arguments Friday morning, Americans are one step closer to learning whether a ...
Noel Francisco, who is arguing on behalf of the ... Jeffrey Fisher, co-director of the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic at Stanford Law, is now arguing for the eight creators challenging the ...
TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew thanked Donald Trump for his commitment to "finding a solution" that keeps TikTok available in the ...
Attorney for TikTok and parent company ByteDance Noel Francisco provides the ... contemporary issues that have been brought to the Supreme Court. This lesson provides the materials for ...
The TikTok situation highlights the complexity of enforcing regulation compliance on digital platforms supported by companies ...
President-elect Donald Trump is weighing a plan that could delay America’s TikTok ban, giving the new administration more ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback